On Saturday, 10 October 2026, thousands of people went to Jantar Mantar in Delhi with one question. Why have so many names been removed from India's voter rolls?
They did not get an answer. They got barricades. Metro stations were shut, mobile internet around the protest site was switched off, and by evening at least 7,000 people had been detained in the capital, by Scroll's count. Students, farmers, lawyers and journalists were among them.12
Their question is not a small one. By reports cited by CIVICUS and Al Jazeera, about 130 million names have been removed from the rolls nationally.12 Public reports don't make clear how many of those were duplicates, deaths or errors. That breakdown is exactly what voters are owed. In West Bengal alone, about nine million people were left off before the state election. Of the appeals decided so far, about 90 percent ended with the voter being put back on the list.3 Behind each of those numbers is a person who turned up to vote, or tried to, and found their name was gone.
That same afternoon, the BJP held a press conference. Its spokesperson described the protesters as "anarchists", said the opposition was colluding with foreign powers, and called it "Modi versus the Mir Jafars".4 The questions about the voter rolls were not answered there.
I wish I could say this surprised me. It didn't. And when I went back through the last seven years, I understood why. Again and again, when something has gone wrong in this country, the conversation has moved somewhere else. The original problem, and the people it hurt, were simply left behind.
Six times the question changed
In each case below, I've tried to be fair about what the government did. Some of it was right. The problem is what came after: what we ended up talking about, and what quietly disappeared.
A note on how I chose these. Each is a major failure where a specific question was asked publicly and, as far as the record shows, never fully answered. What they show is a sequence: a problem, then a shift in attention. A sequence is not proof that one caused the other. Attention is pulled by many hands at once: parties, TV channels, and the public's own priorities. This piece is less about who moved the conversation, and more about whether anyone came back with an answer.
The jobs that went missing from the conversation
In January 2019, a government survey the government had chosen not to publish leaked to the press. It showed unemployment at 6.1 percent, the highest in 45 years.5 For millions of young Indians looking for work, this was not a statistic. It was their life.
On 14 February, a terrorist attack at Pulwama killed 40 CRPF personnel, and India responded with an air strike at Balakot. A government answering a terrorist attack is doing its job. But national security then became the centre of the election campaign. In April, the Prime Minister asked first-time voters in Latur to dedicate their vote to the soldiers of Balakot and the dead of Pulwama.6
The jobs survey was officially released on 31 May 2019, after the election was over. It confirmed the same 6.1 percent figure.7 The young people it described had already voted without ever hearing it debated.
The workers who walked home
In March 2020, India entered a strict national lockdown with four hours' notice. Millions of migrant workers lost their wages overnight, and many set out to walk hundreds of kilometres home.
At its daily COVID briefings, the Health Ministry began reporting cases linked to a Tablighi Jamaat religious gathering as a separate figure.8 For weeks, a single group of people became the story of the pandemic. In August, the Bombay High Court threw out cases against foreign attendees and said they had been made "scapegoats".9
In September 2020, the government told Parliament it had no data on how many migrant workers died during the lockdown.10 We still don't know.
The soldiers and the economy
In June 2020, 20 Indian soldiers died in a clash with China at Galwan. The Prime Minister's statement that no one had intruded into Indian territory needed a clarification from his own office the next day.11 By the end of August, the economy had shrunk by about 24 percent in a single quarter.12
The death of the actor Sushant Singh Rajput, a genuine tragedy for his family, became the biggest story in the country. By August, according to an analysis published by Newslaundry, three of the largest news channels were spending 50 to 70 percent of their time on it, and less than 2 percent on the economy.12 Ahead of the Bihar election, the BJP's state unit printed posters of the actor with the line "we haven't forgotten, and we won't let you forget".13
The families of the Galwan soldiers, and the millions who lost jobs that year, deserved at least as much airtime.
The oxygen
In April and May 2021, during the second COVID wave, hospitals ran out of oxygen. Families begged for cylinders on social media. People died waiting.
In May, a BJP spokesperson shared a document he said was a Congress "toolkit" for defaming the government. Twitter labelled it "manipulated media", Congress said it was forged, and for days the argument was about the document. Delhi Police then visited Twitter's offices.14
In July 2021, the government told the Rajya Sabha that no deaths due to oxygen shortage had been specifically reported by the states.15 Many families who lived through those weeks would find that hard to read.
The Adani questions
In January 2023, the US short-seller Hindenburg Research published allegations of fraud against the Adani group. The opposition asked for a joint parliamentary committee to investigate.
In March, Parliament was stalled for days, with the government's own benches demanding that Rahul Gandhi apologise for remarks he made in London.16
The joint parliamentary committee was never set up.17 Serious questions about one of India's largest companies never got the open, cross-party hearing so many people had asked for.
Manipur
On 3 May 2023, ethnic violence broke out in Manipur. It has since claimed about 260 lives and displaced tens of thousands of people.19
For 78 days, the Prime Minister did not speak about it publicly. When he did, on 20 July, it was after a video of two women being paraded naked went viral, and in the same statement he also mentioned crimes against women in Rajasthan and Chhattisgarh.18
He first visited Manipur on 13 September 2025, 28 months after the violence began.19 For the people who had lost their homes, that is a very long time to wait to be seen.
What this does not prove
I want to be honest about the limits of this, because the people affected deserve accuracy more than they deserve anger.
None of this proves that anyone planned a distraction. Pulwama was a terrorist attack. Sushant Singh Rajput's death was real, and TV channels chasing viewers needed no one's instructions. Some timings that look suspicious are innocent: the wrestlers protesting in May 2023 were removed from Jantar Mantar on the day the new Parliament opened, but they had chosen that day to march.20 Researchers who study whether governments create distractions on purpose have found the evidence mixed.22
And this government has listened before. After a year of protests, it repealed the three farm laws in November 2021.21
So I am not claiming a plan. I am describing a habit that I find exhausting: a problem appears, the conversation moves, and the problem is never properly answered.
Which brings us back to the voter rolls
Over the past year, the Election Commission has run a Special Intensive Revision of the voter rolls. Voters already on the list were asked to prove their eligibility again, using documents from an approved list.3 The Commission says it was removing duplicate, dead and fraudulent entries, and denies any wrongdoing.2 The Supreme Court upheld the exercise this summer, and on 11 October ordered that peaceful protesters must not be illegally detained.1
Look at what that has meant for the people on the other end of it.
In West Bengal, around 90 percent of the voters whose appeals have been decided were put back on the rolls.3 If a bouncer turned away ten people at the door and nine of them turned out to be on the guest list, you wouldn't say he was being careful. You'd say he was doing the job badly.
One caution: that figure covers only appeals that have been decided. It doesn't tell us how many are still pending, or how many wrongly removed people never appealed at all. Nobody outside the Commission knows the full error rate, and that is part of the problem.
The West Bengal election went ahead on the new rolls while appeals were still pending.3 Petitioners warned that clearing them could take years. The Supreme Court judges, as Time put it, effectively said it was fine for excluded people to sit out the vote, since they would be restored eventually.3 So people got their names back, but only after the vote they had been kept out of was over.
When prominent people in Delhi found themselves left off, the Election Commission set up a special portal to restore their names.3 Everyone else was left with the appeals tribunals.
Time reports that the new state government in West Bengal threatened, more than once, to cut welfare benefits for people excluded through the revision, and that there were widely reported cases of passport renewals being refused.3
Indian electoral law lets any third party object to someone's place on the rolls. In some neighbourhoods, pre-filled objection forms were submitted in bulk, questioning the citizenship of Muslim voters.3
But real questions remain, and they deserve real answers:
- Why were so many of the people removed in West Bengal restored on appeal?3
- Why, as the Indian Express reported, did two of the three election commissioners object to the chief commissioner's decisions at least 14 times in ten months?1
- What happens to the people still waiting for their appeals, some of whom may miss an election before they are heard?3
The answer so far has been barricades, an internet shutdown, and a press conference that called the protesters anarchists.14
Late
OpinionThis is the part of the article where I give an opinion, so let me say exactly what it is.
I don't think the Supreme Court always sides with the government. The record says it doesn't: it struck down electoral bonds, and it stayed Rahul Gandhi's conviction.2816 My worry is different, and I think it's worse. On the questions that matter most, the court too often arrives late. It gets there eventually, after the harm is done, or after the pressure becomes impossible to ignore.
The migrants
On 31 March 2020, while workers were still walking home, the court accepted the government's report that the mass migration had stopped, and blamed fake news for the panic.24 A week later, hearing a plea for workers' wages, Chief Justice S.A. Bobde asked: "If they are being provided meals, then why do they need money for meals?"24
On 25 May, twenty senior advocates wrote to the court urging it to act. The next day, the court took up the migrant crisis on its own.25 That was two months after the lockdown began.
Electoral bonds
The challenge to the electoral bond scheme was filed in September 2017. The court struck the scheme down as unconstitutional in February 2024.26 In between, about ₹16,518 crore worth of bonds were sold, and the BJP received the largest share.27 Those six years took in the 2019 general election and many state elections, all fought under a funding scheme the court would later rule should never have existed.
The citizenship law
Petitions against the Citizenship Amendment Act were filed in 2019. The government brought the law into force in March 2024. The court listed the case for its final hearing in May 2026, more than six years after the petitions were filed.29
The Election Commission
In March 2023, a five-judge bench said the Election Commission must be insulated from the government of the day. Until Parliament made a law, it said, commissioners should be chosen by the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition and the Chief Justice of India.23
Later that year, Parliament did make a law. It replaced the Chief Justice with a Union minister chosen by the Prime Minister, so the government now holds two of the three votes.23 The challenge to that law is still unresolved. In September 2026, two judges disagreed on which bench should even hear it. One of them, Justice Dipankar Datta, observed that such a minister "cannot be expected to defy his own nominator".23
The commission chosen under that system is the one now running the voter-roll revision.
The voter rolls
And here the pattern repeats. Rather than ruling quickly on whether the revision was legal, the court spent months negotiating with the Commission over which documents to accept. It allowed the West Bengal election to go ahead on the new rolls, and effectively said excluded voters could sit out the vote because they would be restored later.3
A referee who blows the whistle after the match is over hasn't technically missed the foul. But the score still stands.
Over to you
I'm not going to tell you what to conclude. You have the dates and the sources below, and you can check every one of them.
But I'd ask you to do one thing over the next few weeks. Keep the voter-roll question in your head. If it starts to fade, notice what replaces it. Then ask whether the people at Jantar Mantar ever got their answer.
Because every story in this article has the same ending. The unemployed, the migrant workers, the families who couldn't find oxygen, the people of Manipur: each time, the country's attention moved on, and they were left with the problem. I don't want the voters who lost their names to be next.
References
- CIVICUS Monitor, "India: Thousands detained in crackdown on mass protests against electoral roll manipulation", October 2026.
- Al Jazeera, "Indian opposition protesters in New Delhi call on election chief to quit", 12 October 2026.
- Time, "In India, a Dark Shadow Falls on Its Vaunted Elections", 13 October 2026.
- Onmanorama, "BJP calls CJP protest a 'flop show', accuses Opposition of fomenting anarchy", 10 October 2026.
- The Week, "'Buried' survey shows unemployment at 45-yr high", 31 January 2019.
- The Week, "Complaints against Modi: Differences in EC over 2 clean chit decisions", 4 May 2019.
- Gulf News, "Post-polls, India unemployment rate officially stays 45-year high", 31 May 2019.
- Udayavani, "COVID-19: 1,445/4,067 cases linked to Tablighi Jamaat event", April 2020.
- Scroll, "Foreigners attending Tablighi Jamaat made 'scapegoats', says Bombay HC, quashes FIRs", August 2020.
- Scroll, "'You didn't count, so nobody died': Rahul Gandhi attacks Centre's lack of data on migrants' deaths", September 2020.
- Onmanorama, "Mischievous interpretation: PMO issues clarification over Modi's comments at all-party meet", 20 June 2020.
- Newslaundry, "Some primetime news channels spent as much as 70% of their time on Sushant Singh Rajput, and less than 2% on the economy", 19 September 2020.
- ThePrint, "Won't let anyone forget: BJP releases posters for Sushant campaign in poll-bound Bihar", September 2020.
- The Week, "Delhi Police visit Twitter offices in Delhi and Gurugram over 'COVID toolkit' probe", 24 May 2021.
- Down To Earth, "Passing the buck: No deaths due to lack of oxygen reported by states, Centre says", July 2021.
- Scroll, "Parliament adjourned again as BJP demands apology from Rahul Gandhi for his remarks in London", March 2023; Al Jazeera, "India's Supreme Court suspends Rahul Gandhi's defamation conviction", 4 August 2023.
- The Tribune, "If nothing to hide, why govt running away from JPC probe into Adani issue: Congress", 2023.
- Deccan Herald, "Filled with pain, anger: PM Modi breaks silence on Manipur violence", 20 July 2023.
- Radio Veritas Asia, "PM Modi visits Manipur after 28 months of ethnic violence", September 2025.
- Scroll, "Delhi Police detain wrestlers marching to new Parliament, clear protest site at Jantar Mantar", 28 May 2023.
- Scroll, "Modi announces repeal of farm laws", 19 November 2021.
- M. Taylor Fravel, "The Limits of Diversion: Rethinking Internal and External Conflict", Security Studies, 2010.
- Outlook, "CJI Out, Minister In: SIR Row Puts Spotlight Back On How Election Commissioners Are Appointed", September 2026.
- Bar & Bench, "Homecoming: How the Supreme Court and the High Courts have dealt with the worst migrant crisis faced by the nation", 2020.
- Supreme Court Observer, "COVID coverage: migrant labourers", 2020.
- ADR, "Electoral bonds scheme: timeline of its journey from inception to the Supreme Court", 2024.
- Business Today, "Electoral bonds worth Rs 16,000 cr sold since its inception; BJP gets the lion's share", 15 February 2024.
- Verdictum, Supreme Court on SBI's plea for more time on electoral bonds data, March 2024.
- LiveLaw, "Supreme Court to start hearing petitions challenging Citizenship Amendment Act 2019 from May 5", 19 February 2026.
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first.